Even a single tear matters!

Hasina Wajid's government confronted a situation that was considerably more destructive than she could have predicted. The protests began in campuses, but they were actually the result of years of pent-up fury and injustice. The spark of rebellion that began in the hearts of young people swiftly evolved into blazing flames on the streets.

Human failure is frequently the result of both personal faults and poor counsel from advisors. Hasina Wajid viewed Khaleda Zia and Jamaat-e-Islami to be personal foes rather than political rivals, which was her biggest error.

When she sentenced the leaders of Jamaat-e-Islami to death in succession, she believed that their party was orchestrating the revolution. Indian media also included the name of ISI, but the truth was that this was the people's wrath, which had been suppressed for years and had finally erupted.

During the 1971 independence campaign, the Awami League and Mukti Bahini referred to Pakistan supporters as "Razakars." Hasina Wajid also mocked the demonstrators by labeling them "Razakars," which the protesters adapted into their own slogan: "Yes, we are Razakars."

This slogan became a significant anti-government icon. Although Jamaat-e-Islami workers were present during the protests, the demonstrations were primarily motivated by public outrage. Hasina Wajid saw it as a political scheme, and hence failed to make the correct judgment.
The fundamental source of public outrage was the injustice and tyranny they faced, combined with uncontrolled individuality.

Hasina Wajid's administration ensured economic success while curtailing public freedoms. When public fury erupted, the interior minister's mansion was set ablaze, as was the chief justice's residence. I saw a snapshot of two young men lying on Hasina Wajid's bed, one using a mobile phone. Despite the fact that the economy was thriving, this scenario exemplified widespread outrage.

Hasina Wajid had to flee, and without any political procedure. The army head, who was a close relative, gave her safe passage. This episode was akin to the Arab Spring, except there was a democratic government in this case. This scene demonstrated a clear reality: persecution and authoritarianism trump economic prosperity. Even golden bread is despised by those forced to consume it.

This problem also compels us to evaluate the contemporary state of India. The NEET and UPSC scams have raised worries about the government.

It is a time to think on how important it is to value people's feelings and freedom in order for any democracy to function. Economic progress is necessary, but disregarding public rights and freedom leads to tragedy. The Indian government should learn from Bangladesh's experience and treat public issues seriously in order to enhance the democratic system and sustain public trust.

Ek Aansu bhi hukoomat ke liye Khatra Hai
Tumne Dekha Nahi Aankhon Ka Samundar Hona

by: Mujahid Azimabadi, Founder and Editor, Weekly Magazine Rooh e Hayat